Writers promise to change old contracts without reading

Writers promise to change old contracts without reading
The article reads that the platform and the writer are a cooperative relationship; the writer also benefits in the free mode; some writers claim that they hope to achieve a rational consensus and resist the “lifting of the table.”Wu, president Hou Xiaonan, editor-in-chief Yang Chen and other new management teams have a roundtable discussion with some authors.Regarding the “copyright” clause that is most concerned, the participating writers generally pointed out that there is something unreasonable.Cheng Wu said that reading will never share or obtain the author’s personal rights in any way.For the copyright, with the voluntary supplement of both parties, the corresponding rights and interests will be matched for the author’s authorization.Hou Xiaonan said, “The mechanism for free reading is still under discussion.”I think reading must continue to consolidate and enlarge, and in the future when considering the free model, there will also be clear writers’ benefits.”  The Air Force began the collective “retirement” of Japanese senior executives on April 27. Some reading authors gathered at the Dragon Sky Forum (hereinafter referred to as Longkong.com) to discuss the reasons for the departure of Wuwenguan, and the focus was on readingCopyright attribution in the “new contract”, adjustment of merger ratio, free reading affects income, etc.The discussion spread to Weibo, Zhihu, Post Bar, Station A and Station B, and other discussion areas, and triggered a “five-five-figure cutout” on May 5.On April 29th and May 4th, the reading experience suffered two consecutive declines, each down by 4.65% and 8.18%, turned up on May 5 and rose by 3 that day.44%, up 6 on May 6.95%, closed at level one 35.40 pieces.Sauna, Ye Wang Bai Jinlei hits the roundtable: The article said that it is a cooperative relationship with the writer. At the roundtable on the afternoon of May 6, the author group and the reading mainly focused on the “new contract”, which specifically related to the problem of copyright attribution.Relationships, merger ratios, and research reading disputes for free.The new length of the article clearly stated that “in view of the unreasonable points left over from the contracts of the past many years, it should and must be amended, and the rights that writers should have should be clearly stated in the terms.”For the copyright problem of creators, some authors have published articles:” The starting point took the full copyright of the author very early, and the deadline has been fifty years after the author’s death.After the starting point was launched, other websites have kept up.”Well, Cheng Wu said that copyright is divided into copyright and copyright personal rights, and copyright personal rights are not transferable, so the reading department obtained the right to operate the author’s copyright through a contract.”In the contract, it has been clearly stipulated that the distribution of the benefits of the author and the reading in various adaptation processes, that is, if the work obtains the benefits of copyright, we will distribute the relevant benefits with the writer according to the agreement.At the same time, the reading is based on the author’s authorization to develop the copyright and share the benefits with the author.”Cheng Wu said.  Section 11 of the “Contract”.In Article 1, the relationship between the reading and the author is interpreted as “employment”, but the employment of Party B by Party A does not mean that there is a labor relationship or employment relationship in the “Labor Law of the People’s Republic of China” between Party A and Party B, that is,It is said that the reading does not provide a quorum such as labor insurance and social security required by law.  The reading said at the roundtable meeting that the writer and the reading platform are in a cooperative relationship, and the wording of “employment” used in the contract is inappropriately expressed.The writer and the platform really do not belong to the labor-employment relationship, and the expression that there is no labor contract relationship itself is from the perspective of the writer. This clause is to avoid that the cooperative relationship between the two parties is mistaken for the labor relationship, resulting in the author ‘s tax remuneration and other income being counted asRemuneration.At the same time, the author’s welfare policy for reading includes the attendance award, half-year award, etc. The author’s welfare initiated by reading and has been in operation for many years will not be cancelled.  ”Net income is negative, reading will be replaced at your own risk” For the segmentation problem, the sixth of the “new contract”.9 “revenue after substituting segmented proportions for replacement of operating costs” are allocated 50%, as are other subscriptions.Some authors believe that this has indirectly reduced their revenue because the contract is replaced with “net income after replacing operating costs.”  Going on, reading said that the distribution of net income to writers’ e-reading income refers to alternative channel fees and operating expenses, rather than financial net profit concepts, and net income exceeds net profit.Even if the net income is negative after cost accounting, reading the article will also be at your own risk.  In addition, the free reading attempts that may be made by reading the article are also considered to further dilute the author’s income, which is the fifth of the “contract” above.4条称“平台不排除以类似‘点击浏览广告、浏览指定页面、完成互动任务等形式以代替付费购买作品章节’等方式,向终端读者提供协议作品的订阅服务,且该等新型销售模式仍Initially actively selling the works of the agreement, the expected platform infringes the author’s interests.”All the leaders of the reading said at the roundtable discussion that the current mechanism for free reading is still under discussion.Some people think that it is necessary to continue to consolidate and enlarge, and in the future when considering the free model, there will also be a clear writer’s income. Reading the contract will pay the price for the acquisition of related rights.At the same time, it is necessary to plan and search different content libraries for free, matching different product channels and corresponding revenue systems, including Tencent’s own distribution channels such as WeChat reading.Of course, in any case, the mode is chosen by the writer.  The publication did not announce the list of writers participating in the round-table conference. For the reasons for not publishing, the article stated that it was in consultation with the participating authors and was not published for the purpose of protecting the participating authors.The specific way to participate is to take “writers to register independently and make a final decision according to the writer’s time schedule.On the afternoon of May 6, some participating writers said that the real writers want rational consensus and positive change, not cyber violence. “We are resolutely resisting the practice of smashing the pot and tilting the table.””.Some writers believe that “discussing copyright, discussing business models and rights and interests is a matter of business rules, and we all agree, but threatening writers with reports, infringements, and buckling hats is a kidnapping of writers, and it is more directDestroy and hurt our ecology.”■ Doubt the free model to dilute the author’s income?”  Some attempts to read the article on free reading are considered by some authors to dilute their income.”Most authors used to make money from chapter clicks and reader support. If all are free, platinum-level authors will not be greatly affected in a short period of time, but the authors in the middle will be more severe.”” A screenwriter adapted from the Gendarmerie IP.  Regarding the impact of free reading, Shao Yanjun, a professor at the Chinese Department of Peking University, said: “The complex ecology formed in the process of running-in games between authors, managers, and readers is now a relatively simple and crude capital model.I was shocked, then I think it is very harmful to the development of Chinese online literature, it is very unfavorable.”Mr. Han, a senior practitioner of online literature, said:” The advantage is that it saves simplified editing costs and communication costs.The disadvantage is that when the quality of the content cannot be guaranteed, there will be a loss of users, and you will need to repeatedly find the author to buy the copyright during development. “  Several analysts questioned the return on investment of free reading.”According to the ARPU (Average Revenue Per User) of several free reading applications, the break-even is extremely difficult. Once the volume is not bought, the user churn rate is very high.Such users without loyalty can hardly accept high-quality advertisers.The Memorandum of Events on the Reading Contract announced on the evening of April 27th that the Reading Group announced that Wu Wenhui and other five senior executives of the founding team had “retired”.  On April 29th, the author of the online literature forum Long Tiantian said that the author has received a new contract, and there was a discussion caused by “hiring” in the contract.  On April 30, some authors discussed that they should put forward relevant suggestions to the amendment proposal of the Copyright Law.  The discussion on the reading contract on May 1st knows that the popularity has reached fifth, and the post has reached seventh.  On May 2nd, the author of the well-known online article “Dream in the Dream Machine”, “I Eat Tomatoes”, “Tianqian Potato”, “Changshi” and “Feng Lin Tian Xia” speak out.  In the early morning of May 3, the reading group posted a message saying that it would not be free for all.  On the morning of May 3, I read the article and said that I would participate in the round-table conference, and asked the author to register with the editor to avoid food and accommodation.  On May 3rd, the authors of the well-known web authors “Tang Jia San Shao” and “Chen Dong” expressed their views.Hunan, Guizhou, Sichuan, Anhui and other provincial network writers voiced.  On May 4th, the call for “Fifth Five-Year Breakout Festival” rose, knowing that it once reached the third hot list.  On May 5th, the authors of Alibaba, Alibaba, Zongfang, Feilu, Zhangyue and other websites spontaneously changed their posts.  In the evening of May 5, the article responded to the rumors of “comprehensive free”, “owner’s copyright” and “encroachment on the income of deceased authors”.  On the afternoon of May 6th, I read the article and held a cordial discussion with the author. The article promised to amend the old contract.